Legal Opinion · Dissent

Turley v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 26, 2013No. CR-13-161Published

1DissentRita W. Gruber, Judge

Because I think a trial court has discretion to grant or deny expungement under Ark.Code Ann. § 16-93-303,1 respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that our decision in Luevano does not decide this case or support the State’s position. Although the trial court relied on Luevano’s holding that failure to revoke a defendant’s probation “ha[d] no bearing on the issue of whether a defendant fulfilled the terms of his probation for expungement purposes,” that was not the trial court’s ultimate decision in this case. The trial court determined that appellant did not comply with the terms of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. State, Department of Career Education, Division of Rehabilitation Services v. MeansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Cox v. City of Caddo ValleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API