Legal Opinion
United States v. Tyler
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 10, 2008No. 06-2904PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
Earkle Tyler was charged with possessing crack with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Tyler moved to suppress the crack, arguing that it was discovered only after police officers detained and searched him without reasonable suspicion. The district court denied this motion, and Tyler entered a conditional guilty plea. He now challenges the denial of his motion to suppress. Because the officers detained Tyler without reasonable suspicion that criminal activity may be afoot, the suppression motion should have been granted. We vacate Tyler’s…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. Garcia-CantuCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Fox v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Miguel Gutierrez v. Michael KermonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Huff v. ReichertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BeauchampCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.