Grosvenor v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice.
This 12th day of May 2004, upon consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record below, it appears to the Court that:
1) The defendant-appellant, Jamah Grosvenor, filed this appeal from the Superior Court’s denial of his first motion for postconviction relief. The State has moved to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court on the ground that it is manifest on the face of Grosvenor’s opening brief that the appeal is without merit. 1 We agree and affirm the Superior Court’s judgment.
2) Grosvenor was arrested in the early morning of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Younger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Albury v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Somerville v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- State v. BrooksSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
- State v. Campusano-TejadaSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
- State v. MoralesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021