Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Pure Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 1929No. 764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants instituted this suit against appellees to recover damages which they claimed to have suffered by reason of appellees having polluted the water used by them in the manufacture office in the city of Groesbeck. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to appellants' petition. The only question, therefore, for determination, is whether, as against a general demurrer, appellants' petition stated a cause of action.

Appellants alleged:

"That from January 1st, 1925, up to and including December 31, 1925, they owned and operated a manufactory and plant located in the town of Groesbeck in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Gonzales v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McWhirterTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PowersTexas Supreme Court · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. BoyleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API