Legal Opinion

Kassahn v. Kassahn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 1994No. 91-CV-0110; CA A75484PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

This is an equitable proceeding against defendant, Mabel Kassahn, in both her individual capacity and as the personal representative of the estate of Jesse Kassahn. Mabel is the second wife of Jesse. Plaintiffs seek specific performance of a will contract between Jesse Kassahn and his first-wife, Hortense. Plaintiffs also seek a constructive trust on property held jointly by Jesse and Mabel during their almost 20-year marriage. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint and entered judgment in favor of defendant. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3); Puziss v. Geddes, 96 Or App 154, 158, 771…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cameron v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Irwin v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Jacobs v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Puziss v. GeddesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sheldon v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API