Legal Opinion
Shoemaker v. Denke
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 2004No. 02-573PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Appellant Maurice Shoemaker appeals from the order entered by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Sanders County, dismissing his petition for judicial review of a final agency decision of the Human Rights Commission. We affirm.
¶2 The following issue is presented on appeal:
¶3 Did the District Court err in dismissing Shoemaker’s petition for judicial review for failure to exhaust administrative remedies?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶4 On March 3, 2000, Kathy Denke (Denke), City Clerk for the City of Thompson Falls (City), filed a charge with the Human Rights Commission (HRC) alleging…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Larson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- Pickens v. Shelton-ThompsonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Great Falls Tribune v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Jarussi v. Board of Trustees of School Dist. No. 28Montana Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Denke v. ShoemakerMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Qwest Corp. v. Montana Department of Public Service RegulationMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Flowers v. Board of Personnel AppealsMontana Supreme Court · 2020
- City of Billings Police Department v. OwenMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Kenck v. CSED FlemingMontana Supreme Court · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.