State v. Reeder

State v. Smith, 181 Neb. 846, 152 N. W. 2d 16 (1967), in my opinion is distinguishable. It implies that the 1-year period of suspension ran prior to issuance of the Missouri license to Smith. It also implies that Smith failed to obtain an insurance policy. Under rules of stare decisis my going behind the fact basis of the majority opinion in Smith to reexamine records or briefs would be futile. See, County of Madison v. School District No. 2, 148 Neb. 218, 27 N. W. 2d 172 (1947); International Harvester Co. v. County of Douglas, 146 Neb. 555, 20 N. W. 2d 620 (1945).

In the present case the…