Legal Opinion
The Carroll
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 20, 1932No. 1839PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
This case arises on petition of the Eastern Transportation Company, as operator of the barge Carroll, for exemption from or limitation of liability under Revised Statutes §§ 4283=4285 (46 TTSCA §§ 183-185). The proceeding follows the institution of suits on the law side of this court by the representatives of the master and two of the crew of the barge Carroll who, with the other member of her crew, were lost as a result of her sinking on the afternoon of February 16, 1930, off the entrance to Delaware Bay.
The following are found to bo the material facts in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Short v. The ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
- Southgate v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- In Re Eastern Transp. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1929
- The EasternCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Petition of LieblerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- The IowaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1940
- In re Cherokee Trawler Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1957
- Glen Southern Shipping Corp. v. Norfolk Towing Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.