Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 30, 2007No. 26322PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
James W. Henderson, Jr., and his wife, Betty Lee, (collectively referred to as Appellants) appeal the order of the trial court granting summary judgment to Allied Signal, Inc., Daimler Chrysler, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, North American Refractories Company, Pneumo Abex, and Uniroyal Holding, Inc. (Respondents). We affirm.
FACTUALIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellants, North Carolina residents, filed a complaint in 1997 arising out of Mr. Henderson’s exposure to asbestos containing products while working as a boilermaker, pipefitter, and sheet metal worker for many years at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Farmer v. Monsanto Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Cabasug v. Crane Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Patricia Grant v. Foster Wheeler, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Glenn v. 3M CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
- In Re Asbestos Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.