Plasencia v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Judge.
Jose Raul Plasencia appeals an order summarily denying as successive his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The order under review also directed Mr. Plasencia to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings in the underlying case. Thereafter, the postconviction court entered an order denying Mr. Plasencia’s motion for rehearing and directing the clerk not to accept any additional pro se filings from Mr. Plasencia in his case. This court converted Mr. Plasencia’s Summary postconviction…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Huffman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019