Plaisance v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AMY, Judge.
hThe plaintiffs filed suit in district court against the defendant hospital, alleging it negligently credentialed and retained the surgeon who performed various medical procedures on one of the plaintiffs. The defendant hospital filed an exception of prematurity, asserting that the plaintiffs’ allegations were covered under the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act, and thus, were required to first be reviewed by a medical review panel. The trial court sustained the defendant hospital’s exception. The plaintiffs appeal and file an application for supervisory writ. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Coleman v. DenoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Williamson v. HOSPITAL SERVICE OF JEFFERSONSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Dinnat v. TexadaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brandi Billeaudeau, Veronica Billeaudeau, and Joseph Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority, Dr. Kondilo Skirlis-Zavala, and the Shumacher Group of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
- Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital AuthorityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Plaisance v. OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital AuthorityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Brandi Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Health SystemLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.