Legal Opinion
Appeal of DeMoss
Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal
Decided March 12, 2003No. JAT-03-05PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On the 7th day of March, 2003, this matter comes on as regularly scheduled for hearing and is properly before this Court pursuant to Title 26 CNCA § 37 as amended by LA 7-97.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Petitioner/Appellant Harold De-Moss appeals from an adverse ruling of the Cherokee Nation Election Commission on February 27, 2003, pursuant to a protest and challenge filed before the Commission by Respondent/Appellee Kellye Prout. The protest of Prout asked the Commission to declare that Mr. DeMoss was not a qualified candidate for the office of council member in the 7th…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jones v. BurkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Suglove v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Comptroller of Treasury v. LenderkingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Speights v. Willis, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mayes v. Cherokee Nation Election CommissionCherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal · 2003