Legal Opinion

Bohonowsky v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 30, 1976No. Nos. 75-590, 75-591PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse appellant’s conviction of conspiracy to commit a felony, to-wit: grand larceny, and remand with instructions to enter a conviction of the lesser charge, conspiracy to commit a misdemean- or, to-wit: petit larceny. Garland v. State, 291 So.2d 678 (4th DCA Fla.1974). The evidence presented at trial clearly proved that the value of the goods taken by appellants was less than $100. Generally, in such cases it has been said that the best evidence of a person’s intent to steal is what he did steal, White v. State, 274 So.2d 6 (4th DCA Fla.1973); Rumph v. State, 248 So.2d 526 (1st DCA…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rumph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Garland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DellingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. SaiaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  3. Spivey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API