Bohonowsky v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We reverse appellant’s conviction of conspiracy to commit a felony, to-wit: grand larceny, and remand with instructions to enter a conviction of the lesser charge, conspiracy to commit a misdemean- or, to-wit: petit larceny. Garland v. State, 291 So.2d 678 (4th DCA Fla.1974). The evidence presented at trial clearly proved that the value of the goods taken by appellants was less than $100. Generally, in such cases it has been said that the best evidence of a person’s intent to steal is what he did steal, White v. State, 274 So.2d 6 (4th DCA Fla.1973); Rumph v. State, 248 So.2d 526 (1st DCA…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rumph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Garland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DellingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. SaiaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Spivey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999