Dalitzky v. U.S. Small Business Administration
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FREEDMAN, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation entered on September 2, 1992. No objection to the recommendation having been filed it is hereby ordered that it be adopted. The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is allowed.
It is so ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1
(Docket Nos. 13, 17).
September 2, 1992
PONSOR, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Plaintiff, Martha Dalitzky (“plaintiff” or “Dalitzky”) has filed this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- North Dartmouth Properties, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997