United States v. Fernandez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Rodney Jordan Fernandez appeals his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry after deportation, for which he was sen tenced to 70 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.
Fernandez argues for the first time on appeal that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) are unconstitutional. He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed, but he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). As…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Pedro Calderon-PenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jose Prisciliano Gracia-CantuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.