Bray v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. J, C. Easton.
1Opinion of the Court
Devine, Associate Justice.
Defendant was convicted of the theft of a cow, and presents for our consideration, as grounds for a reversal of the judgment, that “the court erred in the charge to the jury, and especially the fifth subdivision thereof;” and “the court erred in overruling de fendant’s motion for a new trial.”
The court erred in the charge referred to, which, after stating that the accused was entitled to the benefit of all reasonable doubt,proceeded to say: “The doubt must not be a mere possible doubt, but it must be a doubt sustained by the evidence, upon a review of all the facts…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- State v. WeckertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Chambliss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.