Legal Opinion

Bray v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. J, C. Easton.

1Opinion of the Court

Devine, Associate Justice.

Defendant was convicted of the theft of a cow, and presents for our consideration, as grounds for a reversal of the judgment, that “the court erred in the charge to the jury, and especially the fifth subdivision thereof;” and “the court erred in overruling de fendant’s motion for a new trial.”

The court erred in the charge referred to, which, after stating that the accused was entitled to the benefit of all reasonable doubt,proceeded to say: “The doubt must not be a mere possible doubt, but it must be a doubt sustained by the evidence, upon a review of all the facts…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  2. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. State v. WeckertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Chambliss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API