Legal Opinion

People v. Crane

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2001No. 88454PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

We are asked to decide whether defendant Anthony Crane’s constitutional right to a speedy retrial was violated when 26 months elapsed between the time the appellate court reversed defendant’s conviction for murder and defendant filed his motion for dismissal on speedy-retrial grounds. After balancing the opposing interests in light of the circumstances of this case, we conclude defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy retrial was not violated.

BACKGROUND

Defendant was arrested on October 31, 1989, for possession of drugs. While in custody, he was questioned about a robbery and arson murder…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. People v. PitmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. GhernaIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. OrtegaIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. CordellIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Tekela v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API