Legal Opinion

Criswell v. Whitney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1895No. 1,701PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the DeKalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

The appellee sued to recover certain insurance money belonging to her, as the owner of a policy-on her deceased husband’s life, but collected by appellant.

The complaint was in six paragraphs; various answers, including the general denial, were filed. Trial was had and a special finding made by the court, with its conclusions of law thereon, upon which judgment was rendered in appellee’s favor.

It is urged that the demurrer to the first paragraph of complaint for want of facts should have been sus-tained. If this paragraph is properly construed by-appellant’s counsel, and is bad for want of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Doan v. DowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Hill v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Soderberg v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Fidelity National Bank v. HenleyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Stewart v. LongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Duran v. DuranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API