In re Shull
Supreme Court of Missouri
Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.
By this proceeding we are asked to review a commitment of petitioner by tbe circuit court of Buchanan county, for an alleged contempt.
*624It appears that on May 7, 1909, the petitioner appeared in Division No. One of the circuit court of Buchanan county, in obedience to a subpoena duces tecum, requiring his presence in said court to testify in a certain cause wherein Mrs. William E. Keller was plaintiff and Eva R. Roth and the Bank of North St. Joseph were defendants, and to bring with him certain taxbills mentioned in the petition in said cause, which the plaintiff therein sought to have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Batchelder v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- In Re ShortridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Hawes v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Chassaing v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Ex parte CreasySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Osborne v. PurdomeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- State ex rel. Evans v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.