Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Herd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1976No. 8677PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

Denying appellants’ petition for adoption of the minor child, the trial court ordered the child removed from the home of appellants, who were temporary managing conservators, appointed an agency the managing conservator, and replaced the child with appellants who were given full and exclusive rights as possessory conservators. Because the judgment provisions expressly or by necessary implication finding that it is in the best interest of the child to remove him from and to replace him in appellants’ home are contradictory, the judgment is reversed and, in the interest of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Traylor v. GouldingTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Taylor v. MeekTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Jackson v. EwtonTexas Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Green v. RemlingTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hopper v. BrittainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. In the Interest W.E.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Rodriguez v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Almarez v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API