Legal Opinion

Johnson v. White Plains Urban Renewal Agency

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn C. Maebach, J.

Petitioner is a tenant in a building operated by respondent, the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of White Plains. On September 17, 1970, respondent served petitioner with a 30-day notice to terminate. No reasons were-given in the notice to terminate. It is undisputed that there is at present no general eviction taking place in the subject premises as a result of a demolition of the building for the purpose of slum clearance or rehabilitation.

*294It is petitioner’s contention that before she may be evicted,, she must be afforded written notice of the reasons for the termination of her tenancy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. New York City Housing Authority v. EscaleraSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Davis v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970
  4. Williams v. White Plains Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ruffin v. Housing Authority of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sherman v. KopachNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Eastwood Building Committee v. BermanNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Laureano v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Meyer & Steffens, Inc. v. PopolizzioNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  5. City of New York v. Pymm Thermometer Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API