Legal Opinion

John C. Rogers & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 6, 1975No. 75-14 C.A.D. 1158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The same issue1 involving the same parties was decided adversely to appellant by the Customs Court in John C. Rogers & Co., Inc., a/c Hoeganaes Sponge Iron Corp. v. United States, 64 Cust. Ct. 12, C.D. 3952 (1970). This court affirmed the judgment of the Customs Court, holding that its determination was not clearly contrary to the weight of the evidence. 58 CCPA 104, C.A.D. 1012, 436 F. 2d 1034 (1971).

During the trial of this second case, appellant introduced testimony of two experts in the refractory field for .the purpose of establishing the common meaning of “fire brick.” One of these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John C. Rogers & Co., Inc. A/c Hoeganaes Sponge Iron Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. John C. Rogers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  4. Department of Energy v. WestlandCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API