Legal Opinion
Otto v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 13, 1986No. Civ. A. HAR 84-908PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARGROVE, District Judge:
Plaintiffs, Hugh and Linda L. Otto, Arizona residents, filed this medical malpractice case against the National Institute of Health (hereinafter NIH) seeking recovery for the allegedly substandard treatment and care provided by Linda’s physicians at NIH; Plaintiffs originally filed a claim on January 14, 1983, with the Department of Health and Human Services for an adminis trative settlement of 5.5 million dollars under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. The Department of Health and Human Services denied Mrs. Otto’s claim on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- John M. Kossick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Betty Jean Brown, a Minor, by Owen Walter Brown, Her Guardian Ad Litem, and Owen Walter Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Leslie E. Portis, an Infant, Who Sues by Her Father and Next Friend, James R. Portis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Patricia Reilly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Linda L. Otto, Hugh Otto v. National Institute of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987