Legal Opinion

Putt v. Duncan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 1877Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ford county; the lion. Owen T. Beeves, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtLacey, J.

This was a suit by appellee against appellant, brought on a promissory note, dated March 25, 1876, for $500.

The defense set up to the note was, that it was the balance of $1,500 agreed to be paid by appellant to appellee for the purchase of a stallion horse called “Wonder.” That the horse was warranted to be sound except a small pimple on the leg, and that would not hurt him, and that the horse was entirely worthless; also j>lea of set-off for the $1,000 paid.

The evidence shows that Charles Putt purchased one-half interest in the horse two days after the purchase from appellee, Charles Putt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estep v. FentonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Hopkins v. WoodwardIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Thompson v. HoaglandIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Trustees of Schools for Township six v. StarbirdIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Doyle v. Frank Douglas Machinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API