Legal Opinion
Back Bay Spas, Inc. v. 441 Stuart Marketing, LLC
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 14, 2012No. 11-1057PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Back Bay Spas, Inc. (“Back Bay”), seeks specific performance of a contract — termed the “Letter Agreement”— giving it the right to purchase the space it occupies in a building slated for conversion to condominium units. Three factors complicate the scenario: (1) the other party to the Letter Agreement needed the written consent of its mortgage bank for the sale, but no such writing exists; (2) that would-be seller no longer owns the condominium property, having lost it in a foreclosure sale; and (3) the current owner, appellee 441 Stuart Marketing, LLC…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Destfino v. ReiswigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Frances SladeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Kobayashi v. Orion Ventures, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maine Education Ass'n Benefits Trust v. CioppaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Massachusetts Department of Unemployment Assistance v. OPK Biotech, LLC (In re PBBPC, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2013
- Municipality of Carolina v. Gonzalez (In re Gonzalez)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2013
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Blais (Blais)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2014
- Littlebrook Airpark Condominium Association v. Sweet Peas, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019