Legal Opinion

Bolden v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1975No. 36043PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant-movant appeals from denial of his pro se Rule 27.26 motion. In the trial court defendant pled guilty and was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for armed robbery and he pled guilty and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment for felonious escape, the sentences to run consecutively.

The only issue raised by movant’s motion is that at the time he pled guilty he had the mistaken belief he could have the two sentences run concurrently. On appeal he contends he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing and to have counsel appointed to represent him on his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. Beach v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Duisen v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. Haynes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pickens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Spencer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Lett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Snethern v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Andrews v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API