Legal Opinion
Bloomingdale Road Judgement Recovery v. Wise
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 2010Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carolyn E. Demarest, J.
Plaintiff moves for a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215 against defendants in 12 separate actions for breaches of vehicle lease agreements. Plaintiff is seeking judgment with nine percent interest.
*1080Background
The pro se plaintiff commenced Bloomingdale Road Judgement Recovery v Wise (index No. 31984/09) by summons and notice to recover the outstanding debt the defendant allegedly owes on the lease of a truck. This is one of 12 nearly identical actions brought by plaintiff against different defendants (collectively, Bloomingdale Actions).1 The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parker v. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cellular Telephone Co. v. Village of TarrytownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Micro-Spy, Inc. v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Daniels v. King Chicken & Stuff, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- McDermott v. HoenigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.