Legal Opinion
Vermont v. Cattanach
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 1, 1970No. 123-69PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.
The defendant was adjudged guilty after unsuccessfully defending himself against a complaint for a motor vehicle violation. Pie understood that a probable consequence of his conviction would be a suspension of his operator’s license, but he didn’t know when this might happen.
Suspension was ordered on December 26, 1967. On the same day, the commissioner of motor vehicles sent by certified mail a copy of his order suspending the defendant operator’s license for a twenty day period effective December 29, 1967. The order called upon the defendant to deliver his license to the commissioner at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- In Re MurdockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CrosscupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Aiken v. MalloySupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Boutin v. ConwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Houle v. QuennevilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.