Legal Opinion

Godwin v. City of Bainbridge

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1984No. 68398PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Appellant-plaintiff filed a two-count complaint against appelleedefendant. In count one of his complaint, appellant sought specific performance of an alleged oral employment contract between the parties. In count two, appellant alleged that he had been fraudulently induced to enter into the oral employment contract, and sought punitive damages. Appellee answered, denying that it had entered into the alleged oral employment contract. Summary judgment was granted in favor of appellee and appellant appeals.

Resolution of the instant appeal necessitates a recitation of the following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Venture Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Adamson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Adamson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Beasley v. PonderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Willis v. Rabun County BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Presto v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Seminole Peanut Co. v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Johnson v. AshkoutiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Johnson v. University Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API