Legal Opinion

LaManna v. GD SEARLE AND CO.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 26, 1990No. 1-88-2717PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi

Plaintiff Debbie LaManna (plaintiff), brought a product liability-action against defendant G.D. Searle & Company (defendant). The suit charges that plaintiff was injured and became infertile as a result of an infection caused by a CU-7 Intrauterine Copper contraceptive device (IUD), manufactured by defendant. Plaintiff’s husband, Tom LaManna, joined in the suit as a plaintiff in a separate count for loss of consortium. The trial court applied the discovery rule for determining when the two-year limitation period for filing the action began to run, and entered summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Aspegren v. Howmedica, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Ravin v. A.H. Robins Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Young v. McKiegueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Hertel v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Mitsias v. I-Flow CorporationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Carlson v. FishAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. Janousek v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API