Legal Opinion
Eagan v. Boyarsky
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 7, 1999PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
GARIBALDI, J.
The basic issue in this case, as in Lowe v. Zarghami, 158 N.J. 606, 731 A.2d 14 (1999), also decided today, is whether a clinical professor employed by the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (“UMDNJ”), who practices medicine in a UMDNJ affiliated private hospital, is a public employee entitled to notice under the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 14—4 (“TCA”). We again conclude that UMDNJ faculty physicians practicing in affiliated private hospitals are public employees for the purposes of the Tort Claims Act.
I
A. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lowe v. ZarghamiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- S.E.W. Friel Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Lamb v. Global Landfill ReclaimingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Dambro v. Union Cty. Pk. Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Feinberg v. STATE, DEPSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Beauchamp v. AmedioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Lowe v. ZarghamiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- D.D. v. University of Medicine & DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Kent Motor Cars, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds, Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Rogers v. Cape May County OfficeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.