Legal Opinion

Hildebrandt v. Newell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1937No. 31,071PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment, after verdict, in favor of plaintiff for $386.70, for rent of a lower duplex, under a lease as extended by the parties. The lease was for a term of one year from September 1, 1932, at a rental of $60 per month, payable in advance on the first day of each month. It contained a clause as follows:

“Lessee further agree to give Lessor written notice thirty days before the expiration of this lease of his intention to vacate at the end of this lease, otherwise Lessor will have option of continuing this lease for .......... from such expiration…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bedford v. . TerhuneNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Bergh v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Rees v. LowySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. C. S. Brackett Co. v. LofgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gorco Construction Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. SHORTLAND v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Tachtronic Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Anderson v. RiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Benasutti v. Coast-To-Coast (Central Organization), Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API