Legal Opinion
Losleben v. Losleben
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 13, 1937No. Nos. 31,182, 31,184PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
The two actions were tried as one, but separate findings were made. Magdalene R. Losleben, plaintiff in one of the actions and one of the defendants in the other, moved for amended findings in each case and appeals from the judgments.
Of these facts there is no dispute: John E. Losleben and his wife, on July 1, 1932, mortgaged their home in the city of Faribault to the Citizens National Bank of Faribault to secure the sum of $2,800. The mortgage was duly recorded on August 18, 1932, and thereafter, on October 24, 1932, assigned by the mortgagee to Magdalene R. Losleben, which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watson v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1885
- Moffet v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Howard v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
- Smith v. SwanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Cunningham v. La Crosse & Saint Paul Packet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lampert Yards, Inc. v. Thompson-Wetterling Construction & Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Geissinger v. RobinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- GBJ, Inc. v. First Avenue Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Marian v. Swanson v. Terrence K. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014