Ex Parte Glasco
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
By denying the writ, we point out that writs of certiorari are frequently denied without any consideration of the merits.Haden v. Olan Mills, Inc., 273 Ala. 129, 135 So.2d 388 (1961). A denial of certiorari should never be considered as an expression by the reviewing court on the merits of the controversy. See Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers,240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). Our denial of the writ should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 513 So.2d 54.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- O. L. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Haden v. Olan Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Glasco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
3Cited by12 opinions
- Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Chevere v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Goodwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.