Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel B. Brewster
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 2, 1974No. 73-1305PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from conviction of defendant Brewster on three counts of an indictment charging violations of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1), Bribery of Public Officials and Witnesses. The jury convicted, not on the bribery section 201(c)(1), but on the illegal gratuity section 201(g), defined by the trial judge’s instructions as a lesser included offense.
Defendant Brewster urges three principal points:(1) Section 201(g) was erroneously designated and charged as a lesser included offense under section 201(c)(1).(2) Section 201(g) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.(3)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Fraser VerrusioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.