Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gilbert v. Elder

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1943No. 7159Published

1Concurrence

BUDGE, J.,

specially concurring. — To my mind the pertinent question here presented is whether the trial court by making and entering its order of October 13, 1943 superseding or staying the preliminary injunction granted October 12, 1943, exercised a sound judicial discretion or abused such discretion. As I read and understand the record there was a total failure on the part of defendant to make any showing that would set in action the discretion of the court to modify, stay or supersede the preliminary injunction. In Safford v. Flemming, 13 Ida. 271, 89 P. 827, it is said that the granting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Price v. GriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Gilpin v. Sierra Nevada Consolidated Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Rowland v. Kellogg Power & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Staples v. RossiIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Paul v. ArmstrongNevada Supreme Court · 1865

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API