Legal Opinion

Mulholland v. Landise

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 23, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,598PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

Plaintiffs filed a bill to foreclose a trust deed and made defendants thereto Thomas H. Landise (a judgment creditor of the grantors named in the trust deed who had perfected the lien of his judgment against the premises) and unknown owners. Landise answered, admitting the material averments of the bill as to the execution of the notes, trust deed, etc., but setting up by way of defense that Thomas Mulholland, deceased, plaintiffs’ predecessor in title, had filed a prior bill to foreclose the same trust deed and in that proceeding obtained jurisdiction of the parties; that a decree of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson ex. dem. Merrit v. BowenNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Robinson v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Walker v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Harper v. ElyIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Bradley v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank v. HurseyWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Illinois Bankers Life Assurance Co. v. DunasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API