Legal Opinion

Croatain Drilling Co. v. Sohyde Drilling & Marine Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1973No. 9180Published

1Opinion of the Court

LANDRY, Judge.

Plaintiff (Croatain), who instituted this proceeding to foreclose a mortgage it held on a barge belonging to defendant (So-hyde), appeals a judgment in the sum of $3,911.25 rendered in favor of Contract Welding and Repair Co., Inc. (Contract), as Intervenor herein, for expenses incurred and custodial services performed while the barge was under seizure. Appellant concedes the correctness of the sum of $1,355.-25 awarded Contract for actual expenses *684incurred, but argues that the sum of $2,556.00 allowed for 142 days of custody at the rate of $18.00 daily is unreasonable. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Readco Industries, Inc. v. Myrmax Specialties, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Bordelon Motors, Inc. v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Haase v. BrumfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Gilmore v. GasquetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API