Legal Opinion

Elizabeth M. Hensgens, Individually, Etc. v. Deere & Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1989No. 88-4396PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

In this case the original complaint named John Deere Corporation as the defendant. The defendant’s correct corporate name is Deere & Company. This misnomer raises the question whether under Louisiana law the complaint, timely filed in a court of competent jurisdiction and venue, interrupted the one-year liberative prescription applicable to delictual actions. We conclude that the misnaming of the defendant in the original complaint was not so egregious as to compel the court to void the effect of a timely filed suit to interrupt prescription of the plaintiff’s claim.

I

The…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hensgens v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. West v. ConrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ray v. Alexandria MallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Kansa Reinsurance Co., Ltd. v. Congressional Mortg. Corp. of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Deleese Allen v. Walmart Stores, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Ivania Maria Couto, Also Known as Sealed Dft 35Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. David E. Tillman v. Csx Transportation, Inc. & Marler L. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Citigroup, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API