Legal Opinion

City of Cambridge v. Inhabitants of Paxton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 12, 1887Published

1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.

Bernard Hastings was duly enlisted and mustered into the naval service of the United States as a part of the quota of the town of Paxton during the late civil war, duly served for a period of more than one year, and left the service by an honorable discharge. Unless lie is, from some cause, one of the persons not included within the operation of the St. of 1865, c. 230, (Pub. Sts. c. 83, § 1, cl. 11,) or unless he has since acquired a legal settlement elsewhere within the State, by which' an earlier settlement would be defeated, his settlement is within the defendant town, and the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Sheffield v. Inhabitants of OtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Inhabitants of Granville v. Inhabitants of SouthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Inhabitants of Lunenburg v. Inhabitants of ShirleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. City of Boston v. Inhabitants of WarwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API