State ex rel. Wellman v. Bell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Application by tbe State, on tbe relation of Mack Wellman, for writ of mandamus and prohibition against Hon. T. F. Bell, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtLeche, J.
The facts in this ease are as follows: A judgment was rendered in favor of Mrs. M. L. Senkosky and against Mack Wellman on July 28, 1917; a motion for a new trial was filed by defendant on the same day, July 28, 1917; the judgment was signed on July 31, 1917; the motion for a new trial was overruled October 22, 1917; and on the same day, October 22, 1917, a motion was presented to the court praying for suspensive and devolutive appeals from said judgment. The trial judge refused to entertain the motion for a suspensive appeal, but granted that for a devolutive appeal. Thereupon the present…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Durbridge v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Mercer v. Natchez, B. & S. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Teutonia Bank & Trust Co. v. HeaslipSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Rohm v. JallansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Britt v. Caldwell Norton Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Saint v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Lacaze v. HardeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ryland v. Harve M. Wheeler Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Herold v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Ball v. CampbellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.