Larry Deering v. Harold M. Brown, Attorney General of the State of Alaska
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
INTRODUCTION
The fifth amendment “guarantees ... the right of a person to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered expression of his own will, and to suffer no penalty ... for such silence.” Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 8, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1493-94, 12 L.Ed.2d 653 (1964). In Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the fifth amendment protects an accused only from being compelled to testify against himself or otherwise provide the state with evidence of a testimonial or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Belgarde v. MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Farmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Rowley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6576, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,740 Gilbert Belgarde v. State of Montana Montana Supreme Court Yellowstone County, Thirteenth Judicial District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.