Legal Opinion

Larry Deering v. Harold M. Brown, Attorney General of the State of Alaska

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1988No. 86-3548PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLE, Circuit Judge:

INTRODUCTION

The fifth amendment “guarantees ... the right of a person to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered expression of his own will, and to suffer no penalty ... for such silence.” Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 8, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1493-94, 12 L.Ed.2d 653 (1964). In Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the fifth amendment protects an accused only from being compelled to testify against himself or otherwise provide the state with evidence of a testimonial or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Belgarde v. MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Farmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  4. Rowley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  5. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6576, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,740 Gilbert Belgarde v. State of Montana Montana Supreme Court Yellowstone County, Thirteenth Judicial District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API