United States v. Slone
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.
Death is different.1 For good reason, death penalty cases demand a different level of scrutiny. But such scrutiny does not justify the Court trampling on the Constitution. Here, Defendant Eugene Slone asks this Court to manage the internal processes of the Department of Justice. Slone specifically wants the Court to impose a schedule for his presentation of mitigating evidence to federal prosecutors so he can convince them not to seek the ultimate punishment. This the Court cannot do without violating the constitutional separation of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Dimitar PetlechkovCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Diaz HernandezDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- United States v. Richardson Dangleben, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2026