Brasfield v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
ODOM, Judge.
Motion for leave to file State’s motion for rehearing was granted so that we could reconsider one particular issue.
On original submission we held that the indictment in this case was subject to the motion to quash filed by appellant. The indictment failed to allege sufficient facts (particularly, the name of the kidnap victim) to give appellant notice of the charges against him and permit preparation of his defense. Drumm v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 560 S.W.2d 944. To this holding we adhere.
In footnote 5 of our opinion on original submission,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Drumm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Benoit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.