Scurto v. Le Blanc

On Rehearing.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

In the application of the plaintiff for a rehearing, and in the argument of his counsel on rehearing, it was contended that the decisions cited in the opinion rendered by this court were not appropriate. The decisions that are cited — and in fact all of the decisions rendered by this court on the subject — maintain that, although parol evidence is admissible for a plaintiff to prove that he was divested, by fraudulent means, of a title to real estate which he^ once owned, parol evidence is not admissible — even when fraud is alleged — to establish a title…