McDonald v. Floyd
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aldrich, J., Richland, June, 1911. Action.' by- T. C. McDonald against- J. W. Fl-oyd and W. A. Floyd. Defendants appeal. cite: Motion in case is proper practice: 5 S. C. 5; 34 S. C. 452; 35 S. C. 612; 40 S. C. 150: Magistrate court acquired no jurisdiction by this summons: Code of Proe. 88, Sub. 16; 43 S. C. 173; 50 S. C. 23; 52 S. C. 86; 71 S. C. 225; 17 S. C. 75; 75 S. C. 40-7. cites: Transcript must shotv everything necessary to give jurisdiction: 28 S. C. 110.…
Read the full summary
Before Aldrich, J., Richland, June, 1911. Action.' by- T. C. McDonald against- J. W. Fl-oyd and W. A. Floyd. Defendants appeal. cite: Motion in case is proper practice: 5 S. C. 5; 34 S. C. 452; 35 S. C. 612; 40 S. C. 150: Magistrate court acquired no jurisdiction by this summons: Code of Proe. 88, Sub. 16; 43 S. C. 173; 50 S. C. 23; 52 S. C. 86; 71 S. C. 225; 17 S. C. 75; 75 S. C. 40-7. cites: Transcript must shotv everything necessary to give jurisdiction: 28 S. C. 110. Failure to appear is deemed acquiescence: 28 S. C. 122; Freeman oo Judg., se-c. 126. Magistrate docket is highest evidence…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion in 'this case was filed on February 26, but remittitur held up on petition for rehearing until
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chirr Justicr Gary.
The following statement appears in the record: “This was a motion in 'the original cause, on behalf of the defendant, W. A. Floyd, to-, stay execution and vacate and set aside a judgment originally rendered against J. W. and W. A. Floyd, on -the first day of April, 1903, by Robert Moorman, Fsq., magistrate for Rich-land county, a transcript of which was filed, and judgment entered thereon, in the Court of Common Pleas' foir…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jenkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- Able v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915