Legal Opinion
Gagle v. Heath
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1944No. 17,212PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDowell, J.
This appeal arises out of a ruling of the court below sustaining a demurrer for want of facts addressed to appellant’s amended complaint, which, as considered by the court after a portion thereof was stricken on motion, was as follows:
“The plaintiff, Orlo Gagle, for his amended complaint, complains of the defendant, Otto M. Heath, and says:
“1. That on the 16th day of September, 1941, the plaintiff was the owner of a 1937 Ford V. 8 Tudor Sedan automobile of the value of $400.00.
“2. That on said 16th day of September, 1941, while said automobile was being operated by the daughter, DeLee Gagle,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Town of Albion v. HetrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. StommelIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Lee v. LaytonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walters v. DeanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rentschler v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
- H. E. McGonigal, Inc. v. EtheringtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
- Wilcox Ex Rel. Wilcox v. HerbstWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- Jenkins v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.