Pietrzak v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was convicted upon an indictment that charged a violation of Title 18, Section 111, of the U.S.Code Annotated. Omitting formal parts, it alleges the interference with and the commission of an assault upon a United States deputy marshal, who was engaged in the performance of his official duties of serving civil process.
The record contains substantial evidence to support the following facts: Deputy Marshal Peeples had made numerous attempts to serve process on Stella and Frank Pietrzak, appellant’s mother and father, but had been unable to do so because the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Samuel Desist, Frank Dioguardi, Jean Claude Lefranc, Jean Nebbia and Anthony SuteraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Long v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Benito Ayala Martinez and Julio Lujano GuardiolaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- State v. AgoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Sheila Mae Abraham, United States of America v. Henrietta W. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.