Winsey v. Pace College
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendánts, Pace College (“Pace”) and Jack S. Schiff (“Schiff”), move pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or, in the alternative, granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Facts
Plaintiff is Ms. Valentine R. Winsey (“Winsey”), a former Associate Professor at Pace. Defendants are Pace,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jake ROWE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Steven OUBICHON, Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Abramson v. University of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Garcia v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Hearth v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1977
- Stewart v. New York UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.