Legal Opinion

Birdsell v. Nichols (In Re Birdsell)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 4, 2004No. Bankruptcy No. 2-02-01744-PHX-RJH. Adversary No. 03-00722Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDOLPH J. HAINES, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue here is whether a debtor’s prepetition application of his right to tax refund to postpetition tax obligations constitutes an asset that must be turned over to the trustee pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 542, 1 even though on the petition date the debtor could not have recovered such asset from the IRS, and it was ultimately used to satisfy postpetition tax obligations. The Court concludes that it was such an asset on the petition date, even though not immediately realizable, and that the Debtor must therefore deliver to the Trustee the value…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re Herbert E. Russell. William Russell Gibson and F.H. Martin, Co-Trustees of the Estate of Herbert E. Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. In Re: James Kenneth FeilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Parker v. Saunders (In Re Bakersfield Westar, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Jack Starr v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Samuel M. Starr v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API